The International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) called for an investigation into the incident in which dozens of migrants died and for those responsible to be severely punished.

In recent days, it has been impossible not to think about the dangers faced by immigrants on their journey to seek a better life, due to the dramatic discovery inside a truck trailer in Texas of 48 dead people and 16 seriously injured people, including children; this has caused shock around the world. 

This case is, to date, the deadliest related to human trafficking in recent U.S. history, and also affects countries such as Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, since several of the fatalities are from these countries.

According to the International Organization for Migration's (IOM) Missing Migrants Project, nearly 3,000 people have been reported missing or killed trying to cross the border from Mexico into the United States since 2014. This latest tragedy brings the total number of deaths in the first six months of the year to 290.

The border between the United States and Mexico presents a great challenge: the region is known for its inhospitable geography, including desert regions and dangerous rivers. 

Among the leading causes of death for migrants on the route to the United States are drowning and accidents. Also included are those who try to avoid natural hazards, hiding in vehicles, and facing other threats, such as the one that caused the deaths in San Antonio, Texas.

The fact that 67 people traveled crammed together, without any control in the vehicle, without ventilation, refrigeration or windows, and also without water and with temperatures almost 40ºC, has caused this tragedy and is proof of the desperation of the migrants.

The survivors of this catastrophe are recovering in the hospital from heatstroke and exhaustion. According to a report in The Texas Tribune, at least five of the 67 passengers were minors, and testimonies gathered by journalists at the scene of the tragedy indicate that most of the passengers were teenagers.

Finally, so far the United States federal authorities have captured 4 people who are already being prosecuted in court for the deaths of the migrants.

News report based on information from: BBC News, IOM and La Opinión. 

Do you want to migrate or legalize your status in the United States? Schedule a consultation at the following link. https://www.asisvisa.com/consulta-legal 

According to international organizations, asylum seekers on the Mexican border are vulnerable to kidnapping, extortion, and murder.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Joe Biden can end the program implemented by his predecessor Donald Trump, which forces asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their court dates in the United States.

In 2019, Trump launched the program officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), and commonly called "Remain in Mexico," as part of a broader offensive against illegal immigration and asylum seekers.

The initiative forced more than 65,000 asylum seekers to recross the border. Many have remained in Mexico for months or years, waiting to present their cases in U.S. courts near the border.

Biden has criticized the MPP as inhumane and suspended new enrollments in the program on his first day in office in January 2021 as part of his efforts to roll back his predecessor's immigration policies.

There have been several attempts by the Biden administration to end this program, but obstacles have always arisen, forcing them to restart it. 

Since the program was restarted by court order, nearly 4,400 migrants seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border have been returned, according to Department of Homeland Security data through mid-June.

Among the nationalities enrolled in the program are Nicaragua, Cuba, Colombia, and Venezuela.

The aforementioned program has been involved in various problems of human rights violations, overcrowding, among other forms of violence.

In April, in Nuevo Laredo, a Mexican border city near Texas, three asylum seekers were kidnapped while local officials were transferring them to a shelter.

News report based on information from: EFE and Reuters. 

Do you want to migrate or legalize your status in the United States? Schedule a consultation at the following link. https://www.asisvisa.com/consulta-legal 

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by a group of Republican-led states to intervene in a case challenging the "public charge" immigration policy, imposed during the Donald Trump era and whose version the Joe Biden administration stopped implementing, returning to the 1999 rule. 

The court heard arguments from the plaintiffs' and the government's lawyers in February and appeared poised to issue a ruling, but on Wednesday it released an unsigned, one-sentence opinion dismissing the case. This leaves intact a lower court ruling in favor of President Biden's administration that states had no right to intervene.

The decision represents a blow to the conservative states that asked the high court to intervene. The opinion was led by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch.

The controversy stems from an August 2019 regulation issued by the Trump administration, dubbed the "public charge" rule, which made it more difficult for immigrants who relied on government assistance programs like Medicaid, subsidized housing, and food stamps to obtain legal status. The rule applied to individuals seeking to enter or remain in the United States, specifically those in the process of obtaining permanent legal status, also known as a green card.

In this dispute, different voices were heard, one of them being that of the Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, who stated that: "The 2019 public charge rule is not consistent with our nation's values," and added that "Under this proposed rule, we will return to the historical understanding of the term 'public charge.' And individuals will not be penalized for choosing to access health benefits and other supplemental government services available to them.".

Migrant advocacy groups say the biggest impact of the rule was to scare immigrants, leading them to reject or not apply for public benefits for fear that these will hinder their processes to obtain permanent residency.

Finally, at the beginning of the month, the U.S. immigration service announced an update to its website related to public charge information. “The update can help with additional information to reduce confusion and fear that could prevent immigrants and their families, including U.S. citizens and their children, from accessing important government services that are available,” said U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).

The 1999 public charge rule establishes guidelines for determining a key ground of inadmissibility that resolves whether or not a foreign national can receive benefits, including lawful permanent residence. 

News report based on information from: Univision and CNN.

Today marks 10 years since the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was launched. Hundreds of thousands of Dreamers benefited, but their immigration status remains far from resolved. 

It was on June 15, 2012, that President Barack Obama announced DACA, a temporary program for those who arrived before 2007, which has protected undocumented young people from deportation and given them temporary work permits, driver's licenses, and a Social Security number, which must be renewed every two years. Since then, approximately 700,000 young people have been protected.

However, in September 2017, President Donald Trump stopped accepting new applications for DACA, and its fate has been decided in the courts. During the first week of July, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to hear the case that has been inactive.

While the program has provided some reassurance to its beneficiaries, this hasn't been complete. Many say it has also left them in limbo, unsure of what will happen next. Some claim it has deprived them of educational and employment opportunities, among other things. Now, their hopes are pinned on Congress and President Biden to fulfill their promise of providing them with a path to citizenship.

In 2021, Congress passed the "Dream and Promise Act," the bill that would formalize the DACA program at the federal level and create a path to citizenship for thousands of Dreamers. But the measure never reached a vote in the Senate.

Finally, some complain that they have been used for political purposes and say they haven't been given a permanent solution. The young people in this program, who arrived in the country as children, are now many professionals contributing to the economy and the country's growth. Therefore, they are demanding citizenship and legal status in the country; it's only fair, and they have endured far too long living in constant uncertainty. 

This news report was compiled using information from: Univision, Telemundo

President Joe Biden unveiled the Los Angeles Declaration on Migration and Protection, which includes 20 countries from the Americas. 

The president said that with this agreement, which he described as a historic commitment, the participating nations plan to transform the approach to migration based on three pillars: offering opportunities, expanding the number of asylum seekers, and strengthening borders. 

The declaration states: “We are committed to protecting the safety and dignity of all migrants, refugees, asylum seekers and stateless persons, regardless of their immigration status, respecting their human rights and fundamental freedoms,” and also, “We intend to cooperate closely to facilitate safe, orderly, humane and regular migration.”.

Although the goal is to implement a more humane policy on migration issues in the region, the agreement makes clear the need for greater control of all borders, which will mean more deportations, as well as the implementation of a special operation against human traffickers or "coyotes".

Likewise, it states that deportations from any of the signatory countries will be an essential element in the plan, although they commit to making "safe and dignified returns".

The signatory countries are: Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Uruguay, Peru and of course the host United States.  

Biden emphasized the importance of addressing the root of the problem: “We recognize the need to promote the political, economic, security, social, and environmental conditions that allow people to live peaceful, productive, and dignified lives in their countries of origin,” he added. “Migration should be a voluntary and informed choice, not a necessity.”.

Furthermore, the declaration consists of the following: 

Assistance at different stages (destination, origin, transit and return):

Both countries of origin and countries hosting large numbers of migrants and refugees may need funding in various areas: protection, public health, security, education, employment, etc. For this reason, increased investment will be promoted.

Immigration protection: 

The need for some people to migrate from their place of origin, due to special circumstances of danger, is recognized, and a commitment is made to create easier and more expeditious protection processes with opportunities to work.

Border protection: 

“We intend to expand collaborative efforts to save lives, address violence and discrimination, counter xenophobia, and combat migrant smuggling and human trafficking,” it states. “This includes greater collaboration to prosecute criminal organizations involved in migrant smuggling and human trafficking, as well as their facilitators and money laundering networks.”

Some sources indicated that the project is largely inspired by the model followed by countries such as Ecuador and Colombia, although these examples have been highlighted during the meeting, these mechanisms would not be replicated in the same way, emphasized José Samaniego, regional director for the Americas of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR).

Finally, this declaration has been a cause for celebration in multiple sectors, entities, etc., including UNHCR, who expressed their satisfaction and full support for such an important declaration, to continue working with states, international organizations and civil society to strengthen access to asylum, protection and solutions for people in need. 

Information taken from: CNN, RTVE, El Diario, France 24 and UNHCR.